Turismo em Unidades de Conservação: adaptação do método visitor activity management process (VAMP) para a caracterização do uso público e o manejo de visitantes no Parque Estadual da Ilha do Mel (PR)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among several methodological options available to the management of the impacts and handling of the visiting in the conservation units we have the Canadian Visitor Activity Management Process (VAMP). The method was adapted and applied to the State Park of Ilha do Mel (PEIM) in the coastline of the State of Parana to study its use by the public. In this context, these works have the central objective to expose the adoption of the VAMP and how it was adapted and applied to the conditions of the PEIM. The mechanism of this application, the generated information and the propositions to subsidize the handling of the public use of the Park, are presented as the results. Also considering that the VAMP, among the management of the impacts and handling of the public use methods in protected areas, presents more affinity with the profile studies, as well as the behavior and public perception in natural tourism destinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it