Properties of potassium currents in Purkinje cells of failing human hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac Purkinje fibers play an important role in cardiac arrhythmias, but no information is available about ionic currents in human cardiac Purkinje cells (PCs). PCs and midmyocardial ventricular myocytes (VMs) were isolated from explanted human hearts. K(+) currents were evaluated at 37 degrees C with whole cell patch clamp. PCs had clear inward rectifier K(+) current (I(K1)), with a density not significantly different from VMs between -110 and -20 mV. A Cs(+)-sensitive, time-dependent hyperpolarization-activated current was measurable negative to -60 mV. Transient outward current (I(to)) density was smaller, but end pulse sustained current (I(sus)) was larger, in PCs vs. VMs. I(to) recovery was substantially slower in PCs, leading to strong frequency dependence. Unlike VM I(to), which was unaffected by 10 mM tetraethylammonium, Purkinje I(to) was strongly inhibited by tetraethylammonium, and Purkinje I(to) was 10-fold more sensitive to 4-aminopyridine than VM. PC I(sus) was also reduced strongly by 10 mM tetraethylammonium. In conclusion, human PCs demonstrate a prominent I(K1), a time-dependent hyperpolarization-activated current, and an I(to) with pharmacological sensitivity and recovery kinetics different from those in the atrium or ventricle and compatible with a different molecular basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".