Crystal growth of a high-<i>T</i><sub>c</sub>SmBCO superconductor in 1 atm oxygen pressure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sm1+xBa2−xCu3Oz (SmBCOss) single crystals with Tc = 95 K and a sharp transition were grown by top-seeded solution growth in 1 atm oxygen pressure. Compositional analysis by the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) technique and Tc measurement with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) indicate that a nearly stoichiometric SmBCO phase with a high Tc value can be reached in a rather wide range of liquid compositions and oxygen partial pressures. Specific features of the SmBCO system phase diagram were elucidated that explain why the SmBCO single crystals grow more easily than YBa2Cu3Oz (YBCO) or Nd1+xBa2−xCu3Oz (NdBCO) ones. The surface morphology of nanostripes was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The nanostripes were thought to act as an effective pinning medium, due to the comparable scale with the vortex core. Furthermore, two SmBCO samples with typical Tc values were analysed by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and the composition fluctuations along their stripes were studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it