MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166329832 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.519

Power-Aware 3D Position-based Routing Algorithms for Ad Hoc Networks

2007· article· en· W2166329832 on OpenAlexaff
Alaa E. Abdallah, Thomas Fevens, Josef Opatrný

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingLink-state routing protocolDynamic Source RoutingStatic routingGeographic routingWireless ad hoc networkRouting protocolWireless Routing ProtocolDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Policy-based routingMultipath routingAlgorithmWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A crucial problem in ad hoc networks is finding an efficient and correct route between a source and a destination; however for many networks, a more important problem is providing an energy efficient route because of, for example, the limited battery life of the wireless nodes. Most previous routing protocols make the routing decision without taking into account the energy budget of the nodes. In addition, when using a fixed transmission power, nodes may waste power by transmitting with more power than is needed for correct reception. In position- based routing algorithms, the nodes use the geographical position of the nodes to make the routing decisions. In this paper we present several localized power-aware 3D position-based routing algorithms that increase the life-time of the network by maximizing the life time of the nodes. These new algorithms use the idea of replacing the constant transmission power of the node with an adjusted transmission power during two stages - first a lower power while discovering the neighboring nodes, and, if needed, a second higher transmission power during the routing process. We evaluate our algorithms and compare their power savings with the current power-aware routing algorithms. The simulation results show a significant improvement in the energy saving (up to 50%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207