MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166345550 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.05.007

La institucionalización de la evaluación del impacto en la salud en Quebec: ¿un modelo factible en España?

2011· article· es· W2166345550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta Sanitaria · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Canadá, Quebec institucionalizó el proceso de la evaluación del impacto en la salud al incluirla en su Ley de Salud Pública. En España, el Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad está en un proceso de reforma de la Ley de Salud Pública, en la cual está prevista la inclusión de la evaluación del impacto en la salud. Este estudio revisa los elementos que han llevado a la implantación efectiva de la evaluación del impacto en la salud en Quebec y reflexiona sobre la posible aplicación del modelo quebequense en el ámbito español. Se recopiló información aportada en entrevistas realizadas en diversas instituciones de salud pública quebequenses. El modelo de Quebec se comparó con la situación española para identificar las posibles necesidades asociadas a la práctica de la evaluación del impacto en la salud en España. Las instituciones de salud pública quebequenses han desarrollado una estrategia para la aplicación efectiva de la evaluación del impacto en la salud. Se fundamenta en varias medidas: creación de una red de representantes ministeriales, desarrollo de un procedimiento interno en el Ministerio de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales para responder a las solicitudes formuladas, elaboración de guías metodológicas, creación de programas de investigación, refuerzo de los mecanismos de transferencia de conocimientos y establecimiento de herramientas de comunicación y participación. La regulación legal de la evaluación del impacto en la salud no garantiza el éxito de su implantación. La institucionalización de dicha evaluación requiere establecer una estructura bien diseñada y la asignación de recursos adecuados. La experiencia desarrollada en Quebec muestra un modelo de implantación de la evaluación del impacto en la salud que podría adaptarse a nuestro país, considerando los elementos de la idiosincrasia española. In Canada, the province of Quebec has institutionalized Health Impact Assessment (HIA) by including it in its Public Health Act (PHA). In Spain, the Ministry of Health, Social Policy and Equality is in the process of reforming its PHA, and plans to include HIA in this legislation. This study reviews the factors that have led to the effective implementation of HIA in Quebec and discusses the possible applications of the Quebec model in the Spanish context. Information was gathered through interviews conducted in various public health institutions in Quebec. The Quebec model was compared to the Spanish situation, to identify potential needs associated with the practice of HIA in Spain. In Quebec, public health institutions have developed a strategy for effective implementation of HIA. This strategy is based on several measures: creation of a network of ministerial representatives, development of an internal procedure at the Ministry of Health and Social Services to respond to requests, preparation of methodological guidelines, establishment of a research program, strengthening of knowledge transfer mechanisms, and establishment of communication and participation tools. HIA legislation does not guarantee its successful implementation. The institutionalization of HIA requires establishing a well-designed structure, as well as the allocation of adequate resources. The Quebec experience offers one model of HIA implementation that could be adapted to our country, taking into account elements of Spanish idiosyncrasies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it