Separation of Aliphatic and Aromatic Acids, Aromatic Sulfonates, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, and Chelating Agents on a Reversed-Phase Column Without Ion Pairing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cleaning products contain a wide variety of components. These include inorganic materials, weak acids, anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, amphoteric compounds, and nonionic materials. The separation of these generally requires the use of multichromatographic modes. A system is developed that would give the maximum information for a cleaning product in a single chromatographic run. With the use of a hydrophobic, high-carbon-loading, and a relatively hydrophobic surface reversed-phase packing, such compounds as aromatic sulfonates, quaternary ammonium compounds, weak acids, nitrilotriacetic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and nonionic materials may be separated in a single run. The mode of separation is considered to be a combination of reversed-phase, ion-suppression reversed-phase, and adsorption chromatography. The separation is made on a YMC-Packl ODS-AQl column (4.6 x 250 mm, 120 angstroms). The separation employs a gradient run starting with 0.01 N H2SO4 for 10 min followed by a gradient for 15 min to 100% acetonitrile and continuing for an additional 5 min with 100% acetonitrile. The flow rate is 1 mL/min, and the separation is monitored at 210 nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it