PAPA‐UIC: a design approach and a framework for secure mobile<i>ad hoc</i>networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Security of Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) is still a hard problem after years of research. We propose a new design approach and a framework for securing a practical type of MANETs. The framework is named PAPA‐UIC , short for Pre‐planned Ad‐hoc Proactive Approach Using Identity‐based Cryptography . In proactive approach, the system starts from a secure status and fortifies this status by protecting packets using cryptography and updating cryptographic keys periodically or when necessary. The proposed scheme addresses the interdependency cycle of secure routing and security services by combining secure routing and key management in one framework. The framework proposes a secure routing protocol (SRP) using identity‐based cryptography and solutions to general problems of identity‐based cryptography. The routing protocol has several improvements over existing ones. The novel ideas to solve key escrow, identity disclosure and identity revocation issues can be integrated into the framework, and can be transplanted to other environments as well. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it