MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166381701 · doi:10.1093/ageing/aft214

New horizons: urinary incontinence in older people

2014· review· en· W2166381701 on OpenAlexaff
William Gibson, Adrian Wagg

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinary incontinenceOlder peoplePsychological interventionUrotheliumUrinary systemLower urinary tract symptomsEtiologyOveractive bladderIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyGerontologyUrologyInternal medicineAlternative medicineNursingPathologyProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urinary incontinence is a common complaint in older people, and is associated with significant impact on the individual, their carers and the wider healthcare system. As the numbers of frail elderly people increase, so will the burden of incontinence. This review examines recent developments in research into the aetiology, physiology, pathology and treatment of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms in older people, and explores potential future developments which might reduce or ameliorate both urinary incontinence and its effects on frail older people. These include increasing understanding of the importance of central control of continence, the role of the urothelium as a sensory organ, novel targets for pharmacological treatments and surgical and invasive interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207