MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166391919 · doi:10.7202/1029310ar

Les bibliothèques publiques québécoises

2015· article· fr· W2166391919 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hélène Roussel

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesDiversification (marketing strategy)BusinessArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les bibliothèques publiques du Québec ont réalisé des progrès importants, principalement depuis la fin des années 1970 : nouvelles constructions, rénovations, augmentation et diversification des collections, informatisation, Internet, services électroniques, ouverture de la Grande Bibliothèque. En cette ère du savoir, des actions bien ciblées, effectuées en concertation au sein d’un réseau, mettant largement à profit les technologies nouvelles, avec un personnel qualifié et nombreux, permettront d’atteindre un plus grand nombre de citoyens dans un esprit d’accessibilité et d’inclusion sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.024
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207