MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166402354 · doi:10.1017/s0263034608000177

Quasi-monoenergetic electron beams generated from 7 TW laser pulses in N<sub>2</sub> and He gas targets

2008· article· en· W2166402354 on OpenAlexafffund
Z.L. Chen, C. Unick, Navid Vafaei-Najafabadi, Ying Y. Tsui, R. Fedosejevs, Neda Naseri, P. E. Masson-Laborde, W. Rozmus

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser and Particle Beams · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAtomic physicsElectronHeliumLaserPhysicsRange (aeronautics)Electric fieldPlasmaBunchesPulse (music)Materials scienceNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quasi-monoenergetic electron beams of energies 12 MeV to over 200 MeV are generated from both nitrogen and helium gas targets with 7TW laser pulses. Typically nitrogen gas interactions lead to electron bunches in the range of 12 to 50 MeV varying from shot to shot. Helium gas leads to higher energy electron bunches from 25 to 100 MeV. Occasionally exceptionally high energy bunches of electrons up to 200 MeV are observed from nitrogen and helium. Initial full two-dimensional simulations indicate the production of 20–30 MeV electron energy bunches for the typical interaction conditions as the electrons are injected from wave breaking in the plasma wake behind the laser pulse and injected into the strong electric field gradient propagating with the optical pulse. This is consistent with the experimental observations from the majority of shots. Pulse compression during propagation in the high density plasma does not allow the threshold conditions for the full bubble regime to be reached. However, the electric acceleration field in the wakefield cavity is still sufficient to lead to the formation of a bunch of electrons with an energy peak in the range of 20 to 30 MeV. In order to explain the occasional high energy shots most likely a lower density channel created by the laser prepulse may occasionally form a natural low density electron guide channel giving ideal conditions for acceleration over much longer lengths leading to the high energies observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser and Particle BeamsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207