The Ideological and Political Education Values of the Constructive Postmodernism VALEUR DE L'ÉDUCATION IDÉOLOGIQUE ET POLITIQUEL DU POSTMODERNISME CONSTRUCTIF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By analyzing and criticizing the modernity, the constructive postmodernism rebuilds a postmodern worldview consistent with human beings’ spiritual needs and value pursuit, promotes human beings’ subjective spirits, and realized human beings’ subjective values. And it is just the purport of ideological and political education to highlight the significance of human beings and the value world. Keywords: constructive postmodernism; ideological and political education valueResume: Le postmodernisme constructif reconstruit une vision du monde postmoderne qui correspond aux besoins spirituels et a la poursuite des valeurs de l'homme en analysant et critiquant la modernite. Il met en valeur l'esprit du sujet de l'homme et la realisation de valeur principale de l'homme. Le centre d'interets de l'education ideologique et politique est d'apporter attention au sens de l'homme et au monde de valeurs.Mots-cles: postmodernisme constructif; education ideologique et politique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.072 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".