MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2166448521 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053270

V781 Tauri: a W Ursae Majoris binary with decreasing period

2006· article· en· W2166448521 on OpenAlexafffund
Josef Kallrath, E. F. Milone, R. A. Breinhorst, R. E. Wilson, A. Schnell, A. Purgathofer

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLight curveEclipseContact binaryOrbital periodRadial velocityMass ratioBinary starAngular momentumAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze light curves of the W UMa type eclipsing binary V781 Tauri from three epochs and radial velocity curves from two epochs simultaneously, including previously unpublished B and V data. The overall time span is from 1983 to 2000 and the solution is done coherently in time (not phase) with five light curves and two sets of primary and secondary velocity curves. Minor systematic differences among the individual light curves are not large enough to undermine the value of a coherent solution that represents 18 years of observations. Times of minima confirm a period of and the general solution finds a small period change, , of that represents recent behavior. The eclipse timings cover the last half-century and find about four times smaller, corresponding to a period change time scale, of about 6 million years. The system is over-contact with a filling factor of 0.205. The solution produces a temperature difference of about 260 K between the components, an inclination of , and a mass ratio . Separate solutions of the several light curves that incorporate dark spots find parameters that differ little from curve to curve. Absolute masses, luminosities, radii and the distance are derived, with luminosities and distance based on star 1 being of type G0V. The orbital angular momentum is compared with those of other W UMa type binaries and is normal. The star to star mass flow that one can infer from is opposite to that expected from TRO (Thermal Relaxation Oscillator) theory, but pertains to a time span that is very short compared to the time scale of TRO oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→