Molecular dynamics study of small molecule inhibitors of the Bcl‐2 family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We carried out docking and molecular dynamics simulations on ABT-737 and obatoclax, which are inhibitors of the Bcl-2 family of proteins. We modeled the binding mode of ABT-737 with Bcl-x(L) , Bcl-2, and Mcl-1 and examined their dynamical behavior. We found that the binding of the chlorobiphenyl end of ABT-737 was quite stable across all three proteins. However, the phenylpiperazine linker group was dramatically more mobile in Mcl-1 compared to either Bcl-x(L) or Bcl-2. The S-phenyl group at the p4 binding site was well-anchored in Bcl-x(L) and Bcl-2 but was somewhat more mobile in Mcl-1 although the phenyl ring itself on average stayed close to the p4 binding site in Mcl-1. This greater mobility is likely due to the greater openness of the p3 and p4 binding sites on Mcl-1. The calculated binding free energies were consistent with the much weaker binding affinity of ABT-737 for Mcl-1. Obatoclax was predicted to bind at the p1 and p2 binding sites of Mcl-1 and the binding mode was quite stable during the molecular dynamics simulation with Mcl-1 wrapping around the molecule. The modeled binding mode suggests that obatoclax is able to inhibit all three proteins because it makes use of the p1 and p2 binding sites alone, which is a fairly narrow groove in all three proteins unlike the p4 binding site, which is much broader in Mcl-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".