X-ray and multiwavelength insights into the inner structure of high-luminosity disc-like emitters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present X-ray and multiwavelength studies of a sample of eight high-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGN) with disc-like Hβ emission-line profiles selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7. These sources have higher redshift (z ≈ 0.6) than the majority of the known disc-like emitters, and they occupy a largely unexplored space in the luminosity–redshift plane. Seven sources have typical AGN X-ray spectra with power-law photon indices of Γ ≈ 1.4–2.0; two of them show some X-ray absorption (column density NH ≈ 1021–1022 cm−2 for neutral gas). The other source, J0850+4451, has only three hard X-ray photons detected and is probably heavily obscured (NH ≳ 3 × 1023 cm−2). This object is also identified as a low-ionization broad absorption line (BAL) quasar based on Mg ii λ2799 absorption; it is the first disc-like emitter reported that is also a BAL quasar. The infrared-to-ultraviolet (UV) spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of these eight sources are similar to the mean SEDs of typical quasars with a UV ‘bump’, suggestive of standard accretion discs radiating with high efficiency, which differs from low-luminosity disc-like emitters. Studies of the X-ray-to-optical power-law slope parameters (αOX) indicate that there is no significant excess X-ray emission in these high-luminosity disc-like emitters. Energy budget analysis suggests that for disc-like emitters in general, the inner disc must illuminate and ionize the outer disc efficiently (≈15 per cent of the nuclear ionizing radiation is required on average) via direct illumination and/or scattering. Warped accretion discs are probably needed for direct illumination to work in high-luminosity objects, as their geometrically thin inner discs decrease the amount of direct illumination possible for a flat disc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".