MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166529652 · doi:10.15537/1658-3175.2631

The outcome of non-operative treatment for undisplaced patellar fractures

2004· article· en· W2166529652 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammed Lafi Al-Otaibi, Fawzi Aljassir, Rudy Reindle

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Medical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiological weaponPatella fractureSurgeryAsymptomaticPathologicalTrauma centerPatellaRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he objective of this study is to assess both clinical and radiological out come of non-operative treatment of none displaced patellar fractures. As the treatment of none displaced patellar fractures remain controversial, a question weather prophylactic surgery is indicated and what is the functional outcome of non-operative management were asked and answered in this study. Undisplaced patellar fractures can be safely and effectively managed none operatively with good outcome results. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing all files and roentgenograms of patients with patellar fracture treated none operatively at McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada from 1999 to 2003. This information was obtained from the trauma database of McGill University Health Center Records. The criteria applied for sample collection are patellar fracture with less than 3mm step and intact extensor mechanism. Exclusion criteria include patellar fractures with more than 3 mm step in the articular cartilage, open fractures, ligaments injury, pathological bone, and preprosthetic fractures. The outcome of the treatment was recorded as healed fracture with no further displacement radiologically and asymptomatic functioning knee clinically. Other relevant information, namely age, gender, mechanism of injury and follow up period were collected. Twenty-eight patients were extracted from the database, however, only 18 of these patients fulfilled the selection criteria. All of them had clinical and radiological assessment. Ten patients (2 pathological, 3 preprosthetic, 2 failed conservative treatment and 3 lost for follow up) were eliminated from the study. Patients demographic data, 8 (44.4%) males, 10 (55.6%) females, age (20-90 years) mean of 58 years, 15 patients (83%) independent and 3 (17%) from a nursing home. Mechanism of injury included sports injury in 5 patients (27.7%), accident at home in 6 patients (33.3%), motor vehicle accident (MVA) in 4 patients (22.2%) and 3 (16.7%) patients in work injuries. All 18 patients were treated with immobilization (cast or brace) for 2 weeks and early physiotherapy. Follow up period ranged from 6-48 months with a mean of 24 months in which patient had documented clinical and radiological finding in the medical records. Radiological evaluation at 3 months showed no further displacement, osseous union were evident in 16 patients (Figures 1a & 1b), 2 patients developed fibrous union, which is asymptomatic. Clinically, 17 patients had no or mild pain and 16 patients had full range of motion and power documented in file notes both in clinical visit and physiotherapy notes. When called for evaluation in this study they were having full range of motion and normal power and we used the contra lateral (uninjured) knee to compare our finding. Patellar fractures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaudi Medical JournalSame topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207