Projet de mobilité interne et carrière organisationnelle : d’un nouveau modèle du projet à une redéfinition de la carrière
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le projet fait désormais partie des « bonnes pratiques » en GRH. Malgré ce consensus parmi les praticiens, il n’existe pas de modèle théorique expliquant la construction des projets de mobilité interne. On propose donc un modèle du projet à partir du paradigme de la construction du sens. Ce modèle est ensuite illustré grâce à l’étude du cas d’une population de commerciaux. Les données recueillies longitudinalement montrent l’influence de l’appréciation des managers et des performances sur la construction des projets. Ils montrent aussi l’influence normative de la carrière organisationnelle traditionnelle. Le modèle présenté et les résultats obtenus permettent de suggérer, en conclusion, une nouvelle définition de la carrière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".