MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166566283 · doi:10.1089/zeb.2014.1060

Pectoral Fin Breeding Tubercle Clusters: A Method to Determine Zebrafish Sex

2014· article· en· W2166566283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueZebrafish · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCARE Canada
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyFish finZebrafishTuberclePectoral muscleAnatomyFinZoologyEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsFisheryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FIG. 1. Distinguishing male and female zebrafish based on large clusters of breeding tubercles (BTs).(A) Male zebrafish possess BT clusters, observed as brown lines, along the central pectoral fin rays (blue arrowheads).(B) Female pectoral fins are translucent, as they do not possess BT clusters (pink arrowhead).(C) Dorsal view of zebrafish in a standard breeding tank.Female pectoral fins (pink arrowheads) can be distinguished from male pectoral fins (blue arrowheads).(D) Under the stereomicroscope, male zebrafish possess BT clusters that appear as spike-like structures along the central fin rays.(F) These structures are absent on female pectoral fins.(E, G) Higher magnification of the central rays of male (E) and female (G) pectoral fins (red boxes in D, F) highlights the presence (blue arrowheads) and lack of BTs, respectively.All scale bars = 200 lm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it