MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166575307 · doi:10.1364/ao.39.006573

Interferometric optical Fourier-transform processor for calculation of selected spatial frequencies

2000· article· en· W2166575307 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Lane, Michael Čada

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsFourier transformPixelInterferometrySpatial frequencyComputer scienceDiscrete Fourier transform (general)Discrete-time Fourier transformOptical path lengthPhysicsAlgorithmFourier analysisMathematicsFractional Fourier transformMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel interferometric optical Fourier-transform processor is presented that calculates the complex-valued Fourier transform of an image at preselected points on the spatial-frequency plane. The Fourier spectrum of an arbitrary input image is interfered with that of a reference image in a common-path interferometer. Both the real and the imaginary parts of the complex-valued spectrum are determined. The source and the reference images are easily matched to guarantee good fringe visibility. At least six interferograms are postprocessed to extract the real and the imaginary parts of the Fourier spectrum at preselected points. The proposed hybrid optical-digital technique is computationally appropriate when the number of desired spatial frequencies is small compared with the number of pixels in the image. When the number of desired points is comparable with the number of image pixels, a conventional or pruned two-dimensional fast Fourier transform is more appropriate. The number of digital operations required by the hybrid optical-digital Fourier processor is proportional to the number of desired spatial frequencies rather than the number of pixels in the image. The points may be regularly distributed over the spatial-frequency plane or concentrated in one or several irregularly shaped regions of interest. The interferometric optical Fourier processor is demonstrated in a moving-object trajectory estimation system. The system successfully estimates the trajectory of multiple objects moving over both stationary and white-noise backgrounds. A comparison of performance was made with all-digital computation. With everything else equal, our hybrid optical-digital calculation was more than 3 orders of magnitude faster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207