MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166578139 · doi:10.1144/petgeo2011-004

Geologically-based permeability anisotropy estimates for tidally-influenced reservoirs using quantitative shale data

2013· article· en· W2166578139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Geoscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyIgneous petrologyOil shaleAnisotropyGeobiologyEconomic geologyGemologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Environmental geologyRegional geologyHydrogeologyPalaeogeographyMetamorphic petrologyPetrologyTelmatologyEngineering geologyGeophysicsMineralogyVolcanismSeismologyGeotechnical engineeringTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of the vertical to horizontal permeability ratio ( k v / k h ) on many displacement properties is significant, making it an important parameter to estimate for reservoir models. Simple ‘streamline’ models have been developed which relate k v / k h at the reservoir scale to shale geometry, fraction and vertical frequency. A limitation of these models, especially for tidally-influenced reservoirs, is the lack of quantitisative geological inputs. To address this lack of data, detailed shale characteristics were measured, using Lidar point clouds, from four different tidally-influenced reservoir analogues: estuarine point bar (McMurray Formation, Alberta, Canada), tidal sand ridge (Tocito Sandstone, New Mexico), as well as both unconfined and confined tidal bars (Sego Sandstone, Utah). Estuarine point bars have long ( x̄ = 67.8 m) shales that are thick and frequent relative to the other units. Tidal sand ridges have short shales ( x̄ = 8.6 m dip orientation) that are thin and frequent. Confined tidal bars contain shales that are thin, infrequent and anisotropic (x– = 16.3 m dip orientation). Unconfined tidal bars contain nearly equidimensional shales of intermediate length ( x̄ = 18.6 m dip orientation) with moderate thicknesses and vertical frequency. The unique shale character of each unit results in a different distribution of estimated k v / k h values. Estuarine point bars have lower average k v / k h values ( x̄ = 8.2 ×10 −4 ) than any other setting because of the long shales they contain. Tidal sand ridges have short, but frequent shales, which results in moderate k v / k h estimates ( x̄ = .011). Estimates of k v / k h are typically highest in confined tidal bars ( x̄ = .038), which contain anisotropic and infrequent shales. Unconfined tidal bars have moderate lengths and frequency resulting in k v / k h estimates averaging 0.004. The results of this study highlight the link between heterogeneity, reservoir architecture and flow parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it