Adaptive multiscale regression for reliable Raman quantitative analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel methodology, adaptive multiscale regression (AMR), to adaptively process Raman spectra for quantitative analysis. The proposed methodology aims to construct an optimal calibration model for a Raman spectrum at hand, regardless of its structural characteristics, thus facilitating the application of Raman spectroscopy as a general tool for analytical chemistry. AMR firstly splits the spectra in a calibration set into frequency components at different scales using adaptive wavelet transform (AWT). Parallel member models constructed at different scales are then fused into a final prediction. The contributions of member models to a fusion model are straightforwardly estimated by a partial least square (PLS) model that emerges from a cross-validation results matrix (X) and reference values (Y). This procedure avoids information leakage by fully utilizing the multiscale nature of the input Raman spectra instead of arbitrarily removing some part of the spectral information by calibrating to selected features. Theoretically, we establish that AMR represents an automatic data-driven strategy that captures the Raman spectral structures adaptively and accurately. Our work tests and refines the AMR method by drawing upon the systematic analysis of spectra formulated to yield challenges representative of those encountered in common Raman analyses. AMR compares favorably with other popular preprocessing methods. Satisfactory calibration results suggest that AMR has the capacity to improve robustness and reliability of Raman spectral analysis, and may well extend to other spectroscopic techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".