Adaptation de la méthode de Penman au calcul du rayonnement net à la pépinière de Luceville, Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La méthode de Penman, qui permet de calculer l’évaporation potentielle, est internationalement reconnue. Le rayonnement net n’étant pas toujours mesuré, Penman a été en mesure de calculer ce paramètre à l’aide d’une équation basée sur le bilan radiatif, dont les coefficients ont partiellement été déterminés à partir de données expérimentales recueillies en Angleterre. À partir des coefficients rapportés par divers auteurs, dont Penman et Mateer, nous avons analysé sept équations basées sur le bilan radiatif. Le rayonnement net a aussi été calculé en effectuant une régression linéaire à partir des variables météorologiques standard. Cette deuxième approche améliore quelque peu les résultats, mais nous avons tout de même retenu l’équation de Mateer adaptée, car celle-ci est basée sur des principes physiques qui la rendent plus applicable en dehors du site à l’étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".