Reactive Ion Etching of Cylindrical Polyferrocenylsilane Block Copolymer Micelles: Fabrication of Ceramic Nanolines on Semiconducting Substrates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The diblock copolymers, poly(isoprene‐ block ‐ferrocenyldimethylsilane) (PI‐ b ‐PFDMS) and poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane‐ block ‐dimethylsiloxane) (PFDMS‐ b ‐PDMS), form cylindrical micelles with an organometallic polyferrocenylsilane core in a solvent of hexanes. These cylindrical micelles were deposited onto a Si substrate from solution by either spin or dip coating, and upon reactive ion etching, continuous ceramic nanolines with lengths of micrometers and widths as small as 8 nm were created. The nanolines were characterized by scanning force microscopy (SFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and were shown to contain Fe, Si, and O from X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies. The widths of the nanolines could be varied from ca. 8 to 30 nm, depending on the composition of the corona (PI or PDMS). The oriented deposition of these cylindrical micelles can be achieved along pre‐patterned grooves on a resist film using capillary forces. Following treatment with hydrogen or oxygen plasma, oriented ceramic nanolines can be fabricated. The approach reported here represents a relatively simple method to create ceramic nanolines with large aspect ratio on semiconducting substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it