MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166611122 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557392

Achieve load balancing and avoid bandwidth fragmentation in MANET QoS routing

2006· article· en· W2166611122 on OpenAlexafffund
Bo Rong, Michel Kadoch, A.K. Elhakeem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile ad hoc networkQuality of serviceComputer networkBandwidth (computing)Admission controlFragmentation (computing)Dynamic bandwidth allocationDistributed computingBandwidth allocationRouting protocolRouting (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new approach of integrating prioritized admission control into QoS routing to achieve load balancing and avoid bandwidth fragmentation in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). As a crucial part of this new approach, the prioritized admission control algorithm is defined to give preference to high-bandwidth connections. An algorithm named bandwidth upper bound with dynamic dropping probability (BUB-DDP) is proposed and investigated as an example of prioritized admission control algorithm in this paper. Because this algorithm is nonlinear and unsolvable by conventional mathematical approach, we employ OPNET simulation to study its performance. The simulation results demonstrate that BUB-DDP can control traffics of different bandwidth requirements effectively, and by combining it with MANET QoS routing protocol, the mission of achieving load balancing and avoiding bandwidth fragmentation can be accomplished successfully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207