Record W2166644567 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.112001

Measurement of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>production in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math>couplings

2013· article· lv· W2166644567 on OpenAlexafffund

G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S.A. Khalek, O. Abdinov, M. Abolins, O. S. AbouZeid, B. S. Acharya, D. L. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2013

Typearticle

Languagelv

FieldPhysics and Astronomy

TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics

FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLundbeckfondenLeverhulme TrustGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAustrian Science FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCERNComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Aeronautics and Space Administration

KeywordsPhysicsLarge Hadron ColliderLeptonNuclear physicsParticle physicsLuminosityCitationComputer scienceLibrary scienceAstrophysics

DOI10.1103/physrevd.87.112001

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artículo escrito por un elevado número de autores, solo se referencian el que aparece en primer lugar, el nombre del grupo de colaboración, si le hubiere, y los autores pertenecientes a la UAM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none

GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical

Teacher disagreement score0.870

Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.006	0.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.004	0.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.002	0.006
Bibliometrics	0.001	0.004
Science and technology studies	0.007	0.007
Scholarly communication	0.004	0.005
Open science	0.006	0.006
Research integrity	0.006	0.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.006	0.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018

GPT teacher head0.261

Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Meta-epidemiology (narrow)Science and technology studies Research integrity Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Study designTheoretical or conceptual

Domainnot available

GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133

Published2013

Admission routes2

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→