A Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation Method for Markov Chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce and study a randomized quasi-Monte Carlo method for the simulation of Markov chains up to a random (and possibly unbounded) stopping time. The method simulates n copies of the chain in parallel, using a (d+1)-dimensional, highly uniform point set of cardinality n, randomized independently at each step, where d is the number of uniform random numbers required at each transition of the Markov chain. The general idea is to obtain a better approximation of the state distribution, at each step of the chain, than with standard Monte Carlo. The technique can be used in particular to obtain a low-variance unbiased estimator of the expected total cost when state-dependent costs are paid at each step. It is generally more effective when the state space has a natural order related to the cost function. We provide numerical illustrations where the variance reduction with respect to standard Monte Carlo is substantial. The variance can be reduced by factors of several thousands in some cases. We prove bounds on the convergence rate of the worst-case error and of the variance for special situations where the state space of the chain is a subset of the real numbers. In line with what is typically observed in randomized quasi-Monte Carlo contexts, our empirical results indicate much better convergence than what these bounds guarantee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".