Influence of <i>N</i>‐terminal residue stereochemistry on the prolyl amide geometry and the conformation of 5‐<i>tert</i>‐butylproline type VI β‐turn mimics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of N-terminal amino acid stereochemistry on prolyl amide geometry and peptide turn conformation were investigated by coupling both L- and D-amino acids to (2S, 5R)-5-tert-butylproline and L-proline to generate, respectively, N-(acetyl)dipeptide N'-methylamides 1 and 2. Prolyl amide cis- and trans-isomers were, respectively, favored for peptides 1 and 2 as observed by proton NMR spectroscopy in water, DMSO and chloroform. The influence of solvent composition on amide proton chemical shift indicated an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the N'-methylamide proton and the acetamide carbonyl for the major conformer of dipeptides (S)-1, that became less favorable in (R)-1 and 2. The coupling constant (3J(NH,alpha)) values for the cis-isomer of (R)-1 indicated a phi2 dihedral angle value characteristic of a type VIb beta-turn conformation in solution. X-ray crystallographic analysis of N-acetyl-D-leucyl-5-tert-butylproline N'-methylamide (R)-lb showed the prolyl residue in a type VIb beta-turn geometry possessing an amide cis-isomer and psi3-dihedral angle having a value of 157 degrees, which precluded an intramolecular hydrogen bond. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the leucyl residues of two turn structures within the unit cell positioned the N-terminal residue in a geometry where their phi2 and psi2 dihedral angle values were not characteristic of an ideal type VIb turn. The circular dichroism spectra of tert-butylprolyl peptides (S)- and (R)-1b were found not to be influenced by changes in solvent composition from water to acetonitrile. The type B spectrum exhibited by (S)-1b has been previously assigned to a type VIa beta-turn conformation [Halab L, Lubell WD. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 64: 3312-3321]. The type C spectrum exhibited by the (R)-lb has previously been associated with type II' beta-turn and alpha-helical conformations in solution and appears now to be also characteristic for a type VIb geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".