Management of acute childhood asthma: a prospective multicentre study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children with acute asthma account for a significant proportion of paediatric hospital admissions, and clear guidelines exist for their care. The aim of this study was to determine their management in the UK. Over 1 year (February 1995 to January 1996), children aged 1-14 yrs admitted with acute asthma were studied in both teaching and district general hospitals. An admission pro forma was used to collect data prospectively, with a computer-based information management system for the input of admissions in each centre. Ten centres collected data prospectively, with 1,578 admissions involving 1,352 children (median age 3.6 yrs). Sixty two per cent of children were <5 yrs of age. Sixty three per cent of admissions had initial arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) recorded, and, in those older than 5 yrs, 36% had their initial peak expiratory flow rate recorded. Systemic steroids were given to 78%. An initial Sa,O2 of <92% was associated with a longer stay in hospital, and also with intravenous treatment. Preventative treatment increased from 42% on admission to 53% on discharge. The rates of documented education were low. This is the largest UK study following publication of national guidelines and shows that there is still room for improvement in the management of children admitted with acute asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".