MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166712842 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v3n6p55

A Study on APEC’s Economic Cooperations under WTO

2012· article· en· W2166712842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)Order (exchange)Government (linguistics)International tradeBusinessEconomicsInternational marketDeveloping countryInternational economicsEconomic policyEconomic growthFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The changes in the international economic order are posing new challenges to the Asia-Pacific countries. To adapt to the WTO system and APEC, they must change their basic pattern of economic policy in relation to industry, finance and other areas, such as labor standards and competition policy. Government policy, however, is not the only, or even the major area facing new challenges. It will be the firms that will have to bear the brunt of the burden of adapting to the new environment. Moreover, the new global economic order no doubt means intensified competition, and it is the firms that compete. In order to survive in the new environment, they must be ready to undergo drastic changes, e.g. strategic alliances beyond national borders. This paper examines how to cooperate each other under APEC & WTO system to realize foreign open policy and to encourage the developing countries to be grow market orient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207