MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166717938 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1999.807862

Influence of harmonics in system voltage on metal oxide surge arrester diagnostics

2003· article· en· W2166717938 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongxi Zhu, M.R. Raghuveer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Hydro
KeywordsHarmonicsSurge arresterElectrical engineeringResistive touchscreenVoltageHarmonic analysisHarmonicMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)Lightning arresterAcousticsEngineeringElectronic engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a metal oxide surge arrester (MOSA) ages, its resistive leakage current increases with accompanying increase in the third harmonic component which is therefore widely used as an indicator of ageing. Since the system voltage may contain harmonics, principally the third, researchers have developed a technique to account for the third harmonic component of capacitive current in deriving the resistive third harmonic current from the leakage current. However, the influence of voltage harmonics on the magnitude of the resistive current has not been considered which aspect is explored in this paper. It is shown that even nominal amounts of the third, fifth, seventh and eleventh system voltage harmonics have considerable influence on the third harmonic component of arrester resistive current. In fact the third harmonic resistive current of an aged MOSA under sinusoidal voltage is comparable to that obtained with an unaged MOSA subjected to harmonic contaminated voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207