Increased expression of protein kinase C isoforms in heart failure due to myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activities of cardiac protein kinase C (PKC) were examined in hemodynamically assessed rats subsequent to myocardial infarction (MI). Both Ca(2+)-dependent and Ca(2+)-independent PKC activities increased significantly in left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) homogenates at 1, 2, 4, and 8 wk after MI was induced. PKC activities were also increased in both LV and RV cytosolic and particulate fractions from 8-wk infarcted rats. The relative protein contents of PKC-alpha, -beta, -epsilon, and -zeta isozymes were significantly increased in LV homogenate, cytosolic (except PKC-alpha), and particulate fractions from the failing rats. On the other hand, the protein contents of PKC-alpha, -beta, and -epsilon isozymes, unlike the PKC-zeta isozyme, were increased in RV homogenate and cytosolic fractions, whereas the RV particulate fraction showed an increase in the PKC-alpha isozyme only. These changes in the LV and RV PKC activities and protein contents in the 8-wk infarcted animals were partially corrected by treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril. No changes in protein kinase A activity and its protein content were seen in the 8-wk infarcted hearts. The results suggest that the increased PKC activity in cardiac dysfunction due to MI may be associated with an increase in the expression of PKC-alpha, -beta, and -epsilon isozymes, and the improvement of heart function in the infarcted animals by imidapril may be due to partial prevention of changes in PKC activity and isozyme contents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".