Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following paper provides an architectural proposal and integrate common Web-services methodologies (XML based messaging, XML based transformation tools, Web-service tools and platforms) in order to facilitate the development of a Web-services based 1451.1 NCAP information model. A distinct separation exists within the 1451.1 NCAP model based on an internal service structure (characterized as internal methods/functions for representation of the 1451.1 object-oriented models) and an external service structure (characterized as 1451 standards based interfaces to transducer components and external network communications). Network visible operations, such as publishing sensory data-readings, are facilitated via a Web-services communication platform, based on WSDL interfaces and WS-eventing services bound to the SOAP protocol. This work entails in the development of a software/Web-services based tool which can expose internal NCAP function-block operations/methods as network visible operations to a remote HMI. The NCAP's data-model is modelled via an XML data representation which complies with the integrity of the proposed IEEE 1451.1 standard's object-oriented model
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".