MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166779638 · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.833363

Performance Bounds for Space–Time Block Codes With Receive Antenna Selection

2004· article· en· W2166779638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Upper and lower boundsBlock codeMathematicsSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Bit error rateSelection (genetic algorithm)Block (permutation group theory)Maximal-ratio combiningAlgorithmDiversity combiningComputer scienceFadingTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsDecoding methodsCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this correspondence, we present a comprehensive performance analysis of orthogonal space-time block codes (STBCs) with receive antenna selection. For a given number of receive antennas M, we assume that the receiver uses the best L of the available M antennas, where, typically, L/spl les/M. The selected antennas are those that maximize the instantaneous received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We derive explicit upper bounds on the bit-error rate (BER) performance of the above system for any M and L, and for any number of transmit antennas. We show that the diversity order, with antenna selection, is maintained as that of the full complexity system, whereas the deterioration in SNR is upper-bounded by 10log/sub 10/(M/L) decibels. Furthermore, we derive a tighter upper bound for the BER performance for any N and M when L=1, and derive an expression for the exact BER performance for the Alamouti scheme when L=1. We also present simulation results that validate our analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it