MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166790954 · doi:10.1112/s1461157008000430

A lower bound for Garsia’s entropy for certain Bernoulli convolutions

2010· article· en· W2166790954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsUpper and lower boundsBernoulli's principleEntropy (arrow of time)Convolution (computer science)Binary entropy function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let β ∈(1,2) be a Pisot number and let H β denote Garsia’s entropy for the Bernoulli convolution associated with β . Garsia, in 1963, showed that H β <1 for any Pisot β . For the Pisot numbers which satisfy x m = x m −1 + x m −2 +⋯+ x +1 (with m ≥2), Garsia’s entropy has been evaluated with high precision by Alexander and Zagier for m =2 and later by Grabner, Kirschenhofer and Tichy for m ≥3, and it proves to be close to 1. No other numerical values for H β are known. In the present paper we show that H β >0.81 for all Pisot β , and improve this lower bound for certain ranges of β . Our method is computational in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it