MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166800236 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v6n4p69

Effects of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and Domestic Investment on Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey

2014· article· en· W2166800236 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yılmaz Bayar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentEconomicsDistributed lagError correction modelMonetary economicsInternational economicsInvestment (military)Gross private domestic investmentFinancial globalizationShort runForeign portfolio investmentMacroeconomicsCointegrationGlobalizationReturn on investmentOpen-ended investment companyMarket economyEconometricsProduction (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreign direct investment flows have increased worldwide over the past three decades in conjunction with financial globalization and thus many studies have been conducted to examine possible effects of foreign direct investment inflows on economic growth. This study investigates the relationship between economic growth and foreign direct investment inflows, domestic investment in Turkey during the period 1980–2012 by using co-integration test and vector error correction model based on autoregressive distributed lag bound test approach. We found that there was a long run relationship among the economic growth, foreign direct investment inflows and domestic investment. On the other hand our findings demonstrated that foreign direct investment inflows affected economic growth negatively in the short and long run, while gross domestic investments affected economic growth positively in the short and long run.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207