A novel mechanism in recessive nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: wild-type aquaporin-2 rescues the apical membrane expression of intracellularly retained AQP2-P262L
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vasopressin regulates water homeostasis through insertion of homotetrameric aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channels in the apical plasma membrane of renal cells. AQP2 mutations cause recessive and dominant nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI), a disease in which the kidney is unable to concentrate urine in response to vasopressin. Until now, all AQP2 mutants in recessive NDI were shown to be misfolded, retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and unable to interact with wild-type (wt)-AQP2, whereas AQP2 mutants in dominant NDI are properly folded and interact with wt-AQP2, but, due to the mutation, cause missorting of the wt-AQP2/mutant complex. Here, patients of two families with recessive NDI appeared compound heterozygotes for AQP2-A190T or AQP2-R187C mutants, together with AQP2-P262L. As mutations in the AQP2 C-tail, where P262 resides, usually cause dominant NDI, the underlying cell-biological mechanism was investigated. Upon expression in oocytes, AQP2-P262L was a properly folded and functional aquaporin in contrast to the classical mutants, AQP2-R187C and AQP2-A190T. Expressed in polarized cells, AQP2-P262L was retained in intracellular vesicles and did not localize to the ER. Upon co-expression, however, AQP2-P262L interacted with wt-AQP2, but not with AQP2-R187C, resulting in a rescued apical membrane expression of AQP2-P262L. In conclusion, our study reveals a novel cellular phenotype in recessive NDI in that AQP2-P262L acts as a mutant in dominant NDI, except for that its missorting is overruled by apical sorting of wt-AQP2. Also, it demonstrates for the first time that the recessive inheritance of a disease involving a channel can be due to two cell-biological mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".