MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166842757 · doi:10.1115/1.3142822

Thermodynamic Analysis of Freezing and Melting Processes in a Bed of Spherical PCM Capsules

2009· article· en· W2166842757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solar Energy Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExergyThermodynamicsHeat transferHeat transfer fluidMaterials scienceDissipationMechanicsVolumetric flow rateSPHERESPhase-change materialChemistryThermalPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solidification and melting processes in a spherical geometry are investigated in this study. The capsules considered are filled with de-ionized water, so that a network of spheres can be thought of as being the storage medium for an encapsulated ice storage module. ANSYS GAMBIT and FLUENT 6.0 packages are used to employ the present model for heat transfer fluid (HTF) past a row of such capsules, while varying the HTF inlet temperature and flow rate, as well as the reference temperatures. The present model agrees well with experimental data taken from literature and was also put through rigorous time and grid independence tests. Sufficient flow parameters are studied so that the resulting solidification and melting times, exergy and energy efficiencies, and exergy destruction could be calculated. All energy efficiencies are found to be over 99%, though viscous dissipation was included. Using exergy analysis, the exergetic efficiencies are determined to be about 75% to over 92%, depending on the HTF scenario. When the HTF flow rate is increased, all efficiencies decrease, due mainly to increasing heat losses and exergy dissipation. The HTF temperatures, which stray farther from the solidification temperature of water, are found to be most optimal exergetically, but least optimal energetically. The main reason for this, as well as the main mode of loss exergetically, is due to entropy generation accompanying heat transfer, which is responsible for over 99.5% of exergy destroyed in all cases. The results indicate that viewing the heat transfer and fluid flow phenomena in a bed of encapsulated spheres, it is of utmost importance to assess the major modes of entropy generation; in this case from heat transfer accompanying phase change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it