MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166910177 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2008.2002906

Beam-Splitting Condition in a Broadside Symmetric Leaky-Wave Antenna of Finite Length

2008· article· en· W2166910177 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadsideLeaky wave antennaBeam (structure)Antenna (radio)Aperture (computer memory)OpticsMicrostrip antennaPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisAcousticsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, the influence of the truncation effects on the beam-splitting property of a broadside symmetric leaky-wave antenna (LWA) is presented. It will be shown that for finite length LWAs, the maximum broadside beam exists at higher phase constant values than suggested by infinite LWA analysis. The accurate beam-splitting conditions are obtained using a computer search algorithm and are reported for a range of practical LWA lengths. The behavior of the aperture distributions at the split conditions is then discussed. To illustrate the application of the result, the theoretical beam-splitting condition plot is used to identify the beam-splitting point of a microstrip based LWA design. Finally, other design implications of the findings are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it