MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166943557 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.807189

Traffic modeling based on FARIMA models

2003· article· en· W2166943557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Data modelingAutoregressive modelAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsEconometricsTime seriesEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a procedure to fit a FARIMA(p,d,q) (fractional autoregressive integrated moving average) model to the actual traffic trace, as well as a method to generate a FARIMA process with given parameters. We show how to model the traffic by fitting FARIMA models to four measured traces. Our experiments illustrate that the FARIMA model is a good traffic model and is capable of capturing the property of real traffic with long-range and short-range dependent behavior. Unlike previous work on FARIMA models, we deduce some guidelines to reduce the complexity of fitting the FARIMA model which would allow us to reduce the computational time of fitting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207