MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166950142 · doi:10.1142/s0219498808002758

CLEAN CLASSICAL RINGS OF QUOTIENTS OF COMMUTATIVE RINGS, WITH APPLICATIONS TO C(X)

2008· article· en· W2166950142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIdempotenceCommutative ringNoncommutative ringPure mathematicsRing (chemistry)QuotientCommutative propertyUnit (ring theory)Von Neumann regular ringLocal ringCommutative algebraPrincipal ideal ringCategory of ringsDiscrete mathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commutative clean rings and related rings have received much recent attention. A ring R is clean if each r ∈ R can be written r = u + e, where u is a unit and e an idempotent. This article deals mostly with the question: When is the classical ring of quotients of a commutative ring clean? After some general results, the article focuses on C(X) to characterize spaces X when Q cl (X) is clean. Such spaces include cozero complemented, strongly 0-dimensional and more spaces. Along the way, other extensions of rings are studied: directed limits and extensions by idempotents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it