MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166952617 · doi:10.1109/acc.2009.5160120

Delay-dependent robust model predictive control for time-delay systems with input constraints

2009· article· en· W2166952617 on OpenAlexaff
Yujing Shi, Tianyou Chai, Hong Wang, Chun‐Yi Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlBounding overwatchControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceRobust controlUpper and lower boundsStability (learning theory)Model transformationDiscrete time and continuous timeTransformation (genetics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsControl systemControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a delay-dependent robust model predictive control (MPC) algorithm for a class of discrete-time linear state-delayed systems subjected to polytopic-type uncertainties and input constraints. The state-feedback MPC law is calculated by minimizing an upper bound of the worst-case quadratic cost function over an infinite time horizon at each sampling instant. In contrast to existing robust MPC techniques, the main advantage of the proposed approach is that the algorithm is derived by using a descriptor model transformation of the time-delay system and by applying a result on bounding of cross products of vectors. This has significantly reduced the conservativeness. It has been shown that robust stability of the closed-loop system is guaranteed by the feasible MPC from the optimization problem. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated by a simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207