Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the literature on men's help seeking offers important insights into health service engagement patterns within this population, there remain gaps in our understanding. In addition to insufficient attention to a range of male experiences and a restricted focus on sex-specific or associated diseases, much of the extant work is limited by insufficient attention to how men navigate needs and supports across illness and a narrow conceptualization of the core concept of help seeking. Specifically, as research focuses on masculinity as a determinant of the decision to seek medical help (emphasis on prediction), less is known about how men, as gendered beings, are experiencing help seeking over the course of illness (emphasis on understanding). In this article, it is argued that research on men's help seeking can benefit from the integration of a dynamic conceptualization of help seeking that is considerate of shifting needs and a diversity of supports and which emphasizes the subjective, interactive, and ongoing patterns in how men are perceiving, interpreting, and responding to the challenges of illness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it