Perception des effets de l’intervention comportementale intensive chez des enfants présentant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif général de cette étude est de décrire la perception de 15 mères d’enfants présentant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) quant aux influences de l’intervention comportementale intensive (ICI). Plus spécifiquement, ce sont les effets perçus de l’ICI sur leur enfant et leur famille qui sont relevés. Des entrevues semi-structurées ont été réalisées et des fiches signalétiques ont été remplies afin de recueillir des données concernant les effets de l’ICI tels que perçus par les mères. Les résultats démontrent des bénéfices importants sur le développement des enfants et des effets positifs sur l’expérience des familles selon les participantes. L’intervention est perçue positivement par l’ensemble des mères. Celles-ci soulèvent quelques inconvénients et apportent des suggestions pour l’amélioration de l’ICI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".