MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166968970 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425216

EM Algorithm for Non-Data-Aided SNR Estimation of Linearly-Modulated Signals over SIMO Channels

2009· article· en· W2166968970 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Ali Boujelben, Faouzi Bellili, Sofiène Affes, Alex Stéphenne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorCramér–Rao boundAdditive white Gaussian noiseAlgorithmMathematicsUpper and lower boundsSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Monte Carlo methodAntenna (radio)Estimation theoryWhite noiseComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the problem of non-data-aided SNR estimation in wireless SIMO channels. We derive the per-antenna ML SNR estimator using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm under constant channels and additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). The new method is valid for any arbitrary constellation. It is NDA and, therefore, does not impinge on the hole throughput of the system. We obtain two non linear vector equations which are tackled by a less complex approach based on the EM algorithm. The noise components are assumed to be spatially uncorrelated over all the antenna elements and temporally white with equal power. Besides, in order to evaluate our EM-ML SNR estimator, we derive the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) in the DA case. Monte Carlo simulations show, that our new estimator offers, a substantial performance improvement over the SISO ML SNR estimator due to the optimal usage of the mutual information between the antenna branches, and that it reaches the derived DA CRLBs. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to derive the ML per-antenna SNR estimators as well as the CRLBs in the NDA and the DA case, respectively, both over SIMO channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207