Writing on the Borderline: Nathan Filer (The Shock of the Fall) and Marjorie Celona (Y)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous nous proposons d’examiner ici deux premiers romans fascinants, tant du point de vue de l’intrigue que de l’écriture: The Shock of the Fall du Britannique Nathan Filer, poète et infirmier psychiatrique de surcroît, et Y de Marjorie Celona, jeune auteur originaire de Colombie-Britannique. Ces deux récits à la première personne font état du mal-être de leurs protagonistes respectifs, Matthew et Shannon, deux adolescents qui ont vécu un événement ou une enfance traumatique ayant fait d’eux des inadaptés sociaux. L’un est hanté par la mort de son frère et interné en hôpital psychiatrique ; l’autre a été victime de maltraitance dans l’une de ses nombreuses familles d’accueil. À l’image de ces deux personnages à la dérive, le récit peine à s’inscrire dans le paysage littéraire et reste en marge des grandes tendances du roman britannique et canadien contemporain. Nous tenterons de montrer comment les deux romans revisitent tour à tour la maladie mentale et la question de la filiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".