MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167019411 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2005.1594126

Fast AWGN reduction in videos using change detection

2005· article· en· W2167019411 on OpenAlexaff
Debashis Sen, M.N.S. Swamy, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInter frameComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseAdaptive filterKalman filterWiener filterComputer visionFilter (signal processing)Spatial filterArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionAlgorithmWhite noiseFrame (networking)Reference frameTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, two low-complexity filters, which are based on a novel filter structure consisting of both the spatial and temporal estimation processes and use a change detection technique to measure the interframe motion, are proposed to reduce additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) in videos. Both the filters use the edge-adaptive Wiener filter for spatial estimation, while for temporal estimation two schemes are proposed, one based on the scalar Kalman filter and the other on the running average filter. These temporal estimation techniques are carded out on the spatial estimate to get the spatiotemporal estimate. The final estimate is obtained by a suitable adaptive combination of the spatial and the spatiotemporal estimates. The use of a change detection technique to measure the interframe motion results in a computational complexity, which is considerably lower than that of the existing filters using motion estimation and compensation technique. The qualitative and quantitative performance of the proposed filters are studied and compared with that of some of the existing ones. It is found that the proposed filters have much less processing time and also have better noise reduction ability compared to the others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207