MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevention of Transient Discoloration of Beef

2001· article· en· W2167050098 on OpenAlexaff
Gaurav Tewari, Digvir S. Jayas, L.E. Jeremiah, Richard A. Holley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetmyoglobinChemistryScavengerFood scienceOxygenModified atmosphereBiochemistryRadicalOrganic chemistryShelf lifeMyoglobin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Oxygen absorbent technology in conjunction with controlled atmosphere packaging(CAP) was used to prevent transient discoloration in master‐packaged beef steaks. Two types of commercial O 2 scavengers were used in the study. The master packs were stored at 1± 0.5 °C. The steaks from master packs were presented in a display‐case for visual evaluation. Reflectance spectra from each steak‐surface were obtained to estimate metmyoglobin content. Steaks packaged without O 2 scavengers showed more discoloration, and had significantly higher proportions of metmyoglobin when compared to steaks with O 2 scavengers, after most storage intervals (p < 0.05). Prevention of metmyoglobin formation was influenced by the number but not the type of O 2 scavenger employed (p > 0.05). Keywords: oxygen scavengers, centralized meat operations, transient discoloration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food ScienceSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207