High‐Pressure Device for Fluid Extraction from Porous Materials: Application to Cement‐Based Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high‐pressure device, reaching an axial pressure of 1000 MPa, intended to the extraction of the pore solution of rigid and slightly porous materials, has been developed to improve the efficiency of extraction. This paper gives an application of fluid extraction from mortars made with Portland cement. It includes an experimental study of the performance of the apparatus, and an analysis of the results in terms of efficiency of extraction, repeatability of measurement, and effect of the squeezing pressure on the pore solution composition. Results shows that: (1) the squeezing efficiency using our apparatus is higher than those found in the literature; (2) the measurement uncertainty ranges between 1.5% and 14%; (3) no significant effect of pressure (up to 1000 MPa) is observed for concentrations of Ca, Na, K, and Si. This paper suggests conducting extraction at 1000 MPa, especially on old concrete or concrete made with low W / C ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it