Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine, en première partie, la théorie de la narrativité élaborée dans Du Sens de Greimas, plus précisément dans l’étude liminaire de la section consacrée au récit : « Éléments d’une grammaire narrative ». En deuxième partie, il présente la manière de faire de la sémiotique proposée par Jacques Fontanille en insistant sur le fait que la perspective du discours en acte renouvelle, sans les renier, les propositions greimassiennes sur la dimension pragmatique du discours. Une analyse de l’action dans deux textes de la dramaturgie québécoise des années 1980, L’Homme gris de Marie Laberge (1986) et La Répétition de Dominic Champagne (1990), éprouve l’efficacité descriptive des schémas et des programmes narratifs issus de Du Sens , tels qu’ils sont actualisés et reconfigurés dans Sémiotique du discours de Fontanille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".