MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167104962 · doi:10.1109/e2emon.2005.1564472

Tracerouting peer-to-peer networks

2006· article· en· W2167104962 on OpenAlexaff
Wenli Liu, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordstracerouteComputer sciencePeer-to-peerComputer networkThe InternetDistributed computingBandwidth (computing)Overlay networkPaceWorld Wide WebNetwork topology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As peer-to-peer (P2P) networks are being developed and deployed on the Internet at a fast pace, the need for a traceroute like mechanism at the application layer surfaces. Such mechanism, once implemented and deployed, will significantly reduce the complexity involved in developing, researching and evolving P2P networks. It will also help users understand how their queries are handled in P2P networks and mitigate their frustration when their queries return nothing. In this paper, we propose and describe AppTraceroute, which is analogous to traditional traceroute but determines the application layer hops and hosts that a query has visited. Meanwhile, we studied the bandwidth consumptions involved when introducing AppTraceroute into pure P2P networks, hybrid P2P networks and structured P2P networks. We have implemented and experimented the concept of AppTraceroute on a structured P2P network, and the results are promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207