A Conformational Intermediate between the Resting and Desensitized States of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural changes induced in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by two noncompetitive channel blockers, proadifen and phencyclidine, have been studied by infrared difference spectroscopy and using the conformationally sensitive photoreactive noncompetitive antagonist 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-m-([(125)I]iodophenyl)diazirine. Simultaneous binding of proadifen to both the ion channel pore and neurotransmitter sites leads to the loss of positive markers near 1663, 1655, 1547, 1430, and 1059 cm(-)(1) in carbamylcholine difference spectra, suggesting the stabilization of a desensitized conformation. In contrast, only the positive markers near 1663 and 1059 cm(-)(1) are maximally affected by the binding of either blocker to the ion channel pore suggesting that the conformationally sensitive residues vibrating at these two frequencies are stabilized in a desensitized-like conformation, whereas those vibrating near 1655 and 1430 cm(-)(1) remain in a resting-like state. The vibrations at 1547 cm(-)(1) are coupled to those at both 1663 and 1655 cm(-)(1) and thus exhibit an intermediate pattern of band intensity change. The formation of a structural intermediate between the resting and desensitized states in the presence of phencyclidine is further supported by the pattern of 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-m-([(125)I]iodophenyl)diazirine photoincorporation. In the presence of phencyclidine, the subunit labeling pattern is distinct from that observed in either the resting or desensitized conformations; specifically, there is a concentration-dependent increase in the extent of photoincorporation into the delta-subunit. Our data show that domains of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interconvert between the resting and desensitized states independently of each other and suggest a revised model of channel blocker action that involves both low and high affinity agonist binding conformational intermediates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".